Radiometric dating not reliable domestic violence sexual assualt teen dating
Never mind that the other methods yield dating results with radiometric dating–something which should be a red flag to any objective inquirer.
Ancient ages to the tune of billions of years are deemed NECESSARY by evolutionists to prop up faltering evolutionary dogma.
) total other dating results discarded based upon wholly subjective considerations.
The discarded results are arbitrarily labeled as “aberrations,” or “contaminated,” or the result of careless testing procedures.
I assert that radiometric dating is completely unreliable.
I have some witnesses to summon, both friendly and hostile, to solidly back up this claim.
Curiously enough, only ONE dating method is known by the general public and only ONE dating method is routinely used by the faithful devotees of evolution, that of radiometric dating from radioactive decay, that is, the measurement of “daughter elements” present in igneous rock as compared to the “parent” radioactive element.
) the rest of the dates that don’t conform to their pet theories, in this case 40(!!!
This case accurately characterizes the entire enterprise of radiometric dating. I am a former atheist and was a evolutionist during my college days, but came to faith in Christ at the age of 20.
Now I regard my pro-creation activities as part of the work of the kingdom of God. Bones of Contention, David Plaisted, Donald Johanson, evolution, fraud, Johanson, KBS Tuff, Leakey, Lewin, paleoanthropology, radiometric dating, Richard Leakey, Roger Lewin, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism, skull 1470, Stansfield, William Stansfield As a scientist, it is hard for me to fathom anyone who has scientific training and does not believe in God. from the University of Rochester in nuclear chemistry and a B.
This is an enormous branch of geochemistry called Geochronology.
It is an accurate way to date specific geologic events.
Much of their totally subjective pseudoscience persists to this day and is chronicled by Lewin.